Friday, July 9, 2010
Last Days of Berlin
Memorial Assignment
With the amount of tragic history the city of Berlin has endured, it is appropriate to memorialize some of these events, people, and days. When such disastrous things take place, it is hard to decide whether to pay tribute to such a thing or not, and if so, how? The Nazi period and era of the Berlin Wall are two points in history in which the city of Berlin has had to struggle with these decisions.
The Nazi period was a dark time in Germany’s history. I think that the German’s have appropriately memorialized the things and people of that time. The Holocaust Memorial by Peter Eisenman pays tribute to those who lost their life during the Holocaust. I think this memorial is important in the fact that it doesn’t just remember the Jewish people that died but everyone including the gypsies, homosexuals, and a-socials. As Americans, for some reason, we focus on the Holocaust in terms of how the Jewish population was affected. It is important to realize and remember that the Holocaust included much more. The Jewish Museum memorializes in a way the entire history of the Jewish people. One particular exhibit focuses on the Jews killed during the Nazi period. This exhibit succeeded in stirring up strong emotions for these people. I didn’t necessarily agree in the way in which the artist evoked these emotions (walking on “faces” of the ones suffering). I don’t believe we as outside parties should have to feel responsible for what happened. The Nazi’s have been recognized and portrayed in an important way in various museums in Berlin. I think by recognizing this past allows people to learn from history and prevent these mistakes from happening in the future. I feel that recognizing the party in museums and not in open public memorials was a smart and appropriate decision. It is evident through the way they have dealt with Nazi memorialization that the German people have learned from this era and are aware of the possibility of Neo-Nazi’s trying to create an uprising.
In more recent history, the era of the Berlin Wall is still affecting the people of Berlin. This period of time is one that people would understandably want to forget. Again, I think it’s important to remember these points in history because it was an important part of what defined Berlin. It also allows people to remember how much progress they have made as a city and a people. The Wall Memorial, I feel, is small enough that residents and tourists can recognize the severity of the time, yet it has been removed enough so that it is not the intrusive object that it once was. I really appreciated how they marked where the entire wall used to be with the two rows of stones through the streets all around the city. It is a subtle thing acting as a scar on the face of the city. It tells a story, and adds to the palimpsestic qualities of the city. Checkpoint Charlie, however, was not much more than a tourist attraction, most tourists being American. I don’t feel like having the checkpoint still up with fake soldiers standing in front adds anything of importance to the Berliners’ dally lives. The Checkpoint Charlie Museum is very informative and allows people to understand how life was for Berliners during this difficult and divided time. This is still a touchy subject for the people of Berlin in many ways, and from an outsiders perspective they are able to work through some of their issues as a city through these memorials.
Monday, July 5, 2010
Reflections of The Wall Jumper
The book The Wall Jumper raises several issues about life in Berlin during the era of the Berlin Wall. The author really begins to shed light on how people went about their daily lives during this time. There were definitely strong attitudes amongst the people of the East and West that were described throughout the different stories. Surprisingly, it seemed that the attitudes of Easterners towards the Westerners and vice versa were very similar in nature. For example, the author accompanied his girlfriend to her family’s house in the East. They would talk about how bad life was on their side of the wall, and the girlfriend would reply with comments about how bad life was in the West. It seems that everyone thought that they were worse off than the others were. As the author jumps around from story to story, one thing that is fairly consistent is the depression among the people. Trying to imagine the people he describes in the airport, train stations, bars, etc., they all seem full of despair. I think the attitudes that the people had and the depression they were experiencing were major parts of why people began to jump the Wall – thinking life must be greener on the other side.
Another interesting point the author touches on is the idea of state versus fatherland and people as a nation versus political boundaries. He basically says that the state in which the Germans belong has not been old enough to call their fatherland, but their fatherland is no longer a state. Stating that you are German is a more of a statement of your people group and language rather than the political boundaries in which you live. I feel like at that time the Germans were at a loss for a national identity. One day you live in the same city and down the street from your family, and the next you live in two different countries. This separation wasn’t a choice for the people - they couldn’t choose whether to be an East German or West German based on their own political view points. In America, if we don’t like the way a city or state is run politically, we have the freedom to pick up and move somewhere else that is better suited (although that is not quite as extreme of a situation as Communism versus Capitalism). I feel that being an American has different connotations that the notion of what language you speak. The US is such a melting pot that you can speak any language and call yourself American. I feel that our nationality has more to do with boundaries and paper work than a people group. This has its advantages and disadvantages. I think this ideal may be the stem of our lack of national unity whereas Germans seem to be more unified as a nation because of their language, people group, and history that they have endured and overcome together.